The Switch will output at a maximum of Full HD (1080p), so if you have a 4K television, it’ll need to do some work to upscale the footage. This compares to both the Xbox One and PS4, which also The result of this is that PS4 and Xbone are themselves half-gen consoles - granted, the 8-core AMD CPU is much, much better than a 3-core IBM PPC750, but Wii U is closer to PS4 and Xbone in terms of graphics than Wii was to PS3 and Xbox 360. And PS4 itself has a big power boost over Xbox One because Microsoft cheaped out on RAM and had to The GPU and RAM is actually much better than ps3/360, but the CPU is terrible. Not only does the CPU have much less than half the clock speed of the ps3/360, but it is actually only a modified over clocked Gamecube CPU with three cores. The CPU is what brings the WII U's performance equal to or lower than ps3/360. -The CPU clock speed of the RAM isn't power. Learn computing. Obviously the Switch is more powerful than a PS3, but in terms of real-world overall performance, it is closer to a PS3 than PS4. Wii U was already stronger than PS3. See Mario Kart 8 vs. ModNation Racers for example. How people still believe the even stronger Switch is less powerful is beyond me. The PS4 Pro is the best option for people who want PlayStation games right now and don’t mind paying over $300 for a sytem, but the PlayStation 4 Slim is a good way to save even more money if you don’t care too much about 4K graphics. . When the Xbox 360 and PS3 were built, the 7900GT and X1900XT were high end and didn't consume too much power/generate too much heat. Now, the GTX 580/HD7970 generates quite a bit of heat. By simple virtue of power consumption and heat generation, I doubt the next Xbox and PS4 will use top of the line GPUs again. For PlayStation 4 on the PlayStation 4, a GameFAQs message board topic titled "How much more powerful is the PS4 than the PS3?" - Page 2. A follow-up to the PlayStation 3 and the wildly popular PlayStation 2, the PS4 packs more power in a smaller package than its predecessors. Two upgraded models of the PS4 were later released in 2016: a Slim model that boasted a smaller frame and a Pro model, which offered more power. Obviously a fragment of a sentence out of context makes no sense. I just asked if the exponentially more powerful hardware of the PS4, compared to the PS3, means that the PS4 has the potential to last longer. The chip inside the PS4 is actually weaker than the PS3's cell processor. Given that PS5 will be easy to buy at some point in the future PS5 has some neat features, and the controller is really nice, but it feels much, much closer to the PS4 than the PS2 felt to the PS1, or the PS3 felt to the PS2. Its not helped by how much more complex games are, and how they target wider ranges of hardware than before, either. 13. kleinepoepjes • 1 yr. ago.

how much more powerful is ps4 than ps3